SOCS England Divisional league

These leagues are similar to the All Comers League, ranking teams located in the selected Division in England.

Close
Filter
  • Season: 2009/10
  • Sport: Rugby Union
  • Age Level: Boys-U18A
  • Division: LSE
Filter

Top 10

Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
1
27 25 0 2 1037 263 774 1 19 92.59% 120
2
36 23 1 12 901 514 387 7 6 65.28% 107
3
25 22 0 3 707 283 424 1 17 88.00% 106
4
21 18 0 3 457 161 296 1 9 85.71% 82
5
22 16 0 6 702 223 479 4 12 72.73% 80
6
26 17 0 9 601 354 247 2 10 65.38% 80
7
22 16 0 6 546 295 251 3 11 72.73% 78
8
18 15 1 2 505 171 334 1 10 86.11% 73
9
23 15 1 7 472 189 283 4 7 67.39% 73
10
16 14 0 2 668 149 519 1 13 87.50% 70
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
11
18 15 0 3 513 156 357 3 6 83.33% 69
12
17 14 0 3 371 193 178 1 7 82.35% 64
13
16 13 1 2 366 148 218 1 8 84.38% 63
14
17 14 1 2 557 211 346 0 4 85.29% 62
15
12 11 0 1 461 60 401 1 9 91.67% 54
16
14 11 0 3 365 179 186 1 8 78.57% 53
17
12 11 0 1 423 87 336 0 8 91.67% 52
18
16 11 1 4 340 175 165 2 4 71.88% 52
19
20 10 1 9 352 475 -123 3 7 52.50% 52
20
17 10 1 6 422 219 203 2 7 61.76% 51
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
21
16 10 0 6 445 231 214 2 8 62.50% 50
22
14 11 0 3 265 156 109 1 5 78.57% 50
23
18 10 0 8 409 373 36 4 6 55.56% 50
24
16 11 0 5 298 250 48 1 4 68.75% 49
25
19 11 0 8 323 282 41 1 4 57.89% 49
26
17 11 0 6 325 295 30 0 5 64.71% 49
27
19 9 0 10 394 410 -16 4 6 47.37% 46
28
20 10 0 10 335 403 -68 3 3 50.00% 46
29
17 9 1 7 261 256 5 3 3 55.88% 44
30
18 8 0 10 372 461 -89 3 7 44.44% 42
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
31
15 9 0 6 312 220 92 1 4 60.00% 41
32
16 7 0 9 272 247 25 7 6 43.75% 41
33
15 8 1 6 255 251 4 2 5 56.67% 41
34
11 8 0 3 263 152 111 0 6 72.73% 38
35
13 8 0 5 282 193 89 2 3 61.54% 37
36
11 7 1 3 245 188 57 0 6 68.18% 36
37
18 6 3 9 317 383 -66 2 4 41.67% 36
38
11 6 0 5 328 178 150 4 7 54.55% 35
39
11 7 1 3 222 158 64 1 4 68.18% 35
40
14 7 1 6 264 212 52 1 4 53.57% 35
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
41
15 7 1 7 199 274 -75 3 1 50.00% 34
42
14 7 1 6 305 299 6 0 3 53.57% 33
43
10 6 0 4 208 124 84 4 4 60.00% 32
44
11 7 0 4 273 95 178 1 1 63.64% 30
45
11 6 2 3 299 141 158 0 2 63.64% 30
46
9 6 1 2 232 119 113 0 4 72.22% 30
47
11 6 1 4 230 126 104 1 3 59.09% 30
48
15 6 0 9 314 288 26 0 6 40.00% 30
49
12 6 0 6 202 187 15 3 3 50.00% 30
50
11 6 0 5 283 206 77 1 4 54.55% 29
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
51
11 6 1 4 164 120 44 1 2 59.09% 29
52
14 6 0 8 212 177 35 4 1 42.86% 29
53
12 6 0 6 171 177 -6 2 3 50.00% 29
54
18 6 0 12 247 352 -105 2 3 33.33% 29
55
9 5 0 4 217 105 112 4 4 55.56% 28
56
10 5 1 4 205 214 -9 1 5 55.00% 28
57
13 5 0 8 255 315 -60 3 5 38.46% 28
58
14 6 0 8 174 271 -97 2 2 42.86% 28
59
10 5 0 5 224 121 103 2 5 50.00% 27
60
11 5 0 6 208 151 57 3 3 45.45% 26
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
61
12 5 0 7 198 238 -40 2 3 41.67% 25
62
10 5 0 5 201 179 22 3 1 50.00% 24
63
10 5 0 5 154 152 2 3 1 50.00% 24
64
10 5 0 5 168 162 6 2 1 50.00% 23
65
16 5 0 11 230 371 -141 0 3 31.25% 23
66
11 5 0 6 212 196 16 1 0 45.45% 21
67
10 4 1 5 135 141 -6 2 1 45.00% 21
68
13 4 0 9 198 254 -56 2 3 30.77% 21
69
9 4 0 5 145 159 -14 1 3 44.44% 20
70
9 4 0 5 205 189 16 0 3 44.44% 19
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
71
10 4 0 6 169 201 -32 0 2 40.00% 18
72
11 4 0 7 101 278 -177 0 2 36.36% 18
73
12 4 1 7 158 346 -188 0 0 37.50% 18
74
8 3 0 5 104 181 -77 0 2 37.50% 14
75
11 2 0 9 110 266 -156 3 2 18.18% 13
76
11 2 0 9 113 289 -176 2 3 18.18% 13
77
9 2 0 7 144 261 -117 2 2 22.22% 12
78
10 2 1 7 79 259 -180 0 1 25.00% 11
79
8 1 0 7 52 202 -150 3 1 12.50% 8
80
12 1 0 11 91 290 -199 4 0 8.33% 8
Scroll to see more stats
# Team P W D L PF PA PD LBP TBP % LP
81
8 1 0 7 37 224 -187 3 0 12.50% 7
82
9 1 0 8 72 276 -204 2 1 11.11% 7
83
8 1 0 7 120 233 -113 0 2 12.50% 6